Here’s how much an Idaho attorney will have to pay after filing a “frivolous pleading” in Chad Daybell’s murder case

Trending 4 months ago
ARTICLE AD BOX
  Published astatine 9:07 pm, May 22, 2024
terry ratliffTerry Ratliff walks to his car aft a tribunal proceeding connected April 18 astatine nan Ada County Courthouse. | Nate Eaton, EastIdahoNews.com

BOISE — A judge has issued an bid imposing sanctions connected a Mountain Home lawyer who revenge an error-filled mobility asking to intervene successful nan execution lawsuit of Chad Daybell.

Terry Ratliff revenge nan mobility connected Friday, March 29 astatine 11:42 p.m., conscionable 2 days earlier assemblage action was group to statesman successful nan trial. Several words were misspelled – including “motion,” “continue,” and “proceedings” and Ratliff had nan lawsuit number wrong. He claimed 3 times successful nan mobility that he represented Daybell arsenic his defense attorney, which was not true, and requested Judge Steven Boyce proceed nan trial.

RELATED | “We’re done!” Judge sanctions lawyer who revenge past minute, error-filled mobility to person Daybell lawsuit delayed

Boyce sealed nan mobility and held a proceeding connected nan matter astatine nan Ada County Courthouse connected April 18. He told Ratliff he was angry nan lawyer was wasting clip and resources successful nan mediate of a superior execution case.

Ratliff explained he utilized a template erstwhile he filmed nan mobility and blamed nan galore mistakes connected nan truth he was nervous.

“This is simply a template shape and I simply forgot to return it off,” Ratliff said. “In nan assemblage of nan motion, I opportunity I americium filing it without support of nan suspect aliases his counsel.”

Boyce asked who he was representing. Ratliff responded he should person signed nan mobility arsenic “citizen.”

“You’ve sewage your name, your Idaho authorities barroom number, your Ratliff Law Office and lawyer for defendant. You’re telling maine you mistakingly revenge thing arsenic a national and not an attorney?” Boyce asked. “Why were you doing that connected a Friday nighttime astatine almost midnight?”

Ratliff responded that he needed to do thing to slow nan lawsuit down to which Boyce replied, “This proceedings is scheduled for really galore years and you wanted to slow it down nan time earlier it started?”

The judge ruled Ratliff violated nan Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure and sanctioned nan attorney. He was ordered to reimburse nan defense, prosecution and tribunal for their clip spent moving connected nan issue.

In a written bid revenge Monday, Boyce said John Prior, Daybell’s attorney, spent 3 hours addressing nan “frivolous pleading.” Prior’s hourly complaint is $350/hour and Ratliff was ordered to salary him $1,050.00.

Prosecutors collectively spent 2.75 hours addressing nan pleading, according to nan order, and requested fees astatine nan complaint of $65/hour, for a full of $178.75.

“The tribunal has considered whether its ain clip spent connected nan pleading should beryllium added arsenic well, and has wished that nan punishment of clip from some parties suffices arsenic a reasonable and capable punishment nether Rule 11. Therefore, nan tribunal sanctions Mr. Ratliff nan sum of $1,228.75,” Boyce wrote.

Ratliff must make nan payments wrong 30 days aliases could beryllium held successful contempt of court.

WATCH THE APRIL 18 HEARING HERE:

SUBMIT A CORRECTION

More
Source east idaho news
east idaho news