Many Alaska king salmon stocks up for Endangered Species Act review after group’s petition

A chinook salmon. (Ryan Hagerty/U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)

A petition to database galore Alaska king salmon stocks arsenic endangered has cleared its first hurdle.

As first reported by nan Northern Journal, it’s chiefly a bureaucratic measurement for nan petition, from nan Washington-based Wild Fish Conservancy, and kicks disconnected a technological reappraisal apt to return astatine slightest a year.

But nan National Marine Fisheries Service said successful an announcement Thursday that listing nan chinook stocks nether nan Endangered Species Act mightiness beryllium basal to prevention nan species. And nan restrictions that would travel on pinch specified a listing could impact everyone from fishermen to roadworthy builders.

Northern Journal newsman Nat Herz is present to talk astir nan petition, nan Fisheries Service announcement and nan implications.

Listen:

[Sign up for Alaska Public Media’s regular newsletter to get our apical stories delivered to your inbox.]

This question and reply has been lightly edited for magnitude and clarity.

Nat Herz: This is the, 1 and nan same, conservation group. The litigation that they revenge a fewer years agone to effort to protect Washington State resident orca whales almost led to nan closure of this really economically important king salmon fishery crossed Southeast Alaska. They person now revenge a benignant of moreover broader petition an effort to get king salmon stocks crossed a immense agelong of 1,000 miles of nan Gulf of Alaska seashore designated arsenic either threatened aliases endangered nether nan Endangered Species Act.

Casey Grove: Apparently, nan National Marine Fisheries Service said they mightiness person a constituent — accent connected nan “might.” What did their announcement connected Thursday say?

NH: Yeah, truthful nan Wild Fish Conservancy revenge their petition astir 4 months agone successful January. And there’s a very defined process that a national agency goes done to fundamentally determine whether a petition by immoderate statement to person a type designated arsenic endangered aliases threatened is merited. And really what they do is they mostly conscionable look astatine nan accusation that’s contained successful this petition, which successful this case, was an 87 -page petition from nan Wild Fish Conservancy pinch a bunch of, like, technological information and footnotes that says, you know, “Here’s why we deliberation each of these different populations successful these different rivers starring into nan Gulf of Alaska, here’s why we deliberation these populations of salmon are astatine really superior risk.”

And what nan Fisheries Service said was this petition really had, you know, a bunch of omissions, a bunch of errors, immoderate different problems. But astatine nan bottommost line, (they said), “We do judge that nan numbers of spawning king salmon person really declined beautiful sharply successful nan past 20 years aliases so. We are seeing smaller king salmon returning to rivers and, you know, based connected nan facts arsenic presented by this organization, a reasonable personification would beryllium concerned astir nan consequence of extinction.” And truthful now, nan adjacent measurement is simply a overmuch much rigorous and independent study of, “Is this listing merited. How superior is nan threat?”

CG: Is nan reasoning that nan Wild Fish Conservancy gives for nan diminution successful salmon stocks, does that statement up pinch the, you know, understood subject down that? And what is that?

NH: Yeah, I mean, I deliberation what’s absorbing astir this petition is like, I don’t deliberation that crossed nan technological organization and crossed nan sportfishing industry, recreational fishermen, tribal governments that person a liking successful these fisheries, like, I don’t deliberation anyone from immoderate of those communities would conflict that it’s really not a bully clip for king salmon. You know, I deliberation 1 of nan things we cognize astir salmon and astir fisheries successful Alaska successful wide is that ambiance alteration has been really bad for immoderate type and immoderate stocks, but different type that actually, you know, possibly it’s having a affirmative effect.

The flip broadside of that is for King Salmon. They’re seeing these declines benignant of crossed nan board, and you talk to moreover group who typically, like, dislike nan Endangered Species Act, they’re not denying that thing needs to beryllium done here. And they’re not needfully disputing nan the technological conclusions, nan data. One of nan challenges is location isn’t 1 circumstantial thing, and peculiarly not 1 circumstantial point that’s easy fixable, that seems for illustration it’s causing this. It seems for illustration there’s warming water waters. There’s possibly title from hatchery raised food retired successful nan ocean, though that’s disputed. Then there’s questions astir residence degradation and bycatch. And it’s like, you know, immoderate of those things are easier to reside than others. But really do we travel to a statement astir what to do? And I deliberation absent nan usage of nan Endangered Species Act, group benignant of person ideas, and they want to do studies, but location isn’t benignant of a clear alternative, which is, I think, why you’re seeing nan Wild Fish Conservancy return nan way that it has taken.

CG: So this announcement from nan National Marine Fisheries Service, is it really conscionable a bureaucratic, procedural thing? Or, like, really superior should group return this?

NH: It’s beautiful clear that this first 90-day uncovering is not immoderate benignant of denotation that nan type will yet beryllium listed. It’s fundamentally saying, “Yeah, you tin combine immoderate information that makes it look for illustration this is simply a problem, but now is erstwhile nan existent benignant of rigorous reappraisal starts.” There’s besides a 60-day nationalist remark play wherever nan National Marine Fishery Service agency, that’s doing nan review, is asking, you know, for feedback from anyone successful nan public, immoderate stakeholders, and really complete this adjacent 9 to 12 months and astir apt longer, they’re going to do a overmuch much rigorous technological review. Then, only astatine that constituent would they make a determination to propose a listing, and past location would beryllium different overmuch much progressive nationalist process wherever group could, you know, put successful comments and feedback. And, you know, likely, a batch of this Endangered Species Act worldly ends up successful court, and astir apt it will astir apt beryllium a judge that makes nan determination astir whether it’s supported to database immoderate of these Gulf of Alaska stocks. But we won’t spot immoderate much news connected this apt for astatine slightest a year.